Technicalities close 10 spacing applications

One applicant's ten spacing applications were all closed.

AER logo Two technicalities brought the regulator to close ten spacing applications submitted by the same person. Too bad – the applicant had put lots of work into the application including 16 attachments that included cross sections and net pay maps for each application.

Our studies show that each application is intended to open the way to about $500,000 of value and opportunity. Each application would have cost 60 man hours to prepare. To have them closed for technicalities seems a waste.

Fifty percent of what you need to know to get an approval isn’t shown in the guides. Can Proven help? We know exactly what the regulator needs.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=6y6v7o38333331313831333271

Tags: AER application, Closure

Granger Low  25 May 2015



Blowdown and NCG injection

SIRs often reveal more than submissions

AppIntel AI contains much more than technical papers

More current. More coverage. More detail. More trusted.

New flood to double reserves for heavy oil pool

The age of water floods is not over

Flood repatterning

Extended life support

Experimental Propane Solvent co-injection in thermal

Continuing Canadian thermal innovation doubled oil production

Measuring the rate of oil and gas technology growth

Energy transition inside the oil industry

The rise of water recycle

Join or perish

AppIntel AI hit alerts

Ignite your insight

This page last updated 13 February 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share