Seismic in the public domain
This applicant even threw in her seismic to convince the regulator of her position. Unfortunately, the application was closed after she submitted net pay maps, cross sections, seismic sections and pressure information into the public domain. And it was all for nothing.
Some applicants think that the more info they submit, the more the regulator will agree with them. This is not always the case. We find that you need to give just enough information to convince the regulator, no more and no less. Too little leaves them unconvinced. Too much information slows down the decision process while they critically review every piece. Our sister company, Proven Reserves, knows just how much information to submit.
Take a peek at his seismic. Help yourself to his application documents through our secure check out.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeEach AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.
Tags: AER application, Closure, Seismic, Tight
Granger Low 5 Jan 2016

Experimental heavy oil recovery technology
AppIntel AI: More technology than technical papers. Much more.

Many start floods. Few can fix them.
Is this how you would treat your new prize asset?

How do you choose an AI?
AI selection criteria

Don't handle pipeline noncompliance this way
Protect yourself - Read his application

Too busy to use oil and gas AI?
Then you are too busy to add oil and gas production quickly