Seismic in the public domain
This applicant even threw in her seismic to convince the regulator of her position. Unfortunately, the application was closed after she submitted net pay maps, cross sections, seismic sections and pressure information into the public domain. And it was all for nothing.
Some applicants think that the more info they submit, the more the regulator will agree with them. This is not always the case. We find that you need to give just enough information to convince the regulator, no more and no less. Too little leaves them unconvinced. Too much information slows down the decision process while they critically review every piece. Our sister company, Proven Reserves, knows just how much information to submit.
Take a peek at his seismic. Help yourself to his application documents through our secure check out.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeEach AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.
Tags: AER application, Closure, Seismic, Tight
Granger Low 5 Jan 2016

Using AI to reduce risk of oil and gas failure
How can you assess the risk without knowing the epic fails?

Artificial intelligence using vetted oil and gas information
Using anything else is dangerous

Your AI search history is being sold to your competitors
Your use of AI is not free

Smarter acquisitions
Video demo on using the KiP box for acquisitions

AI alerts increase the speed of innovation
AI launches oil and gas operators from rival wins




Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share