Seismic in the public domain
This applicant even threw in her seismic to convince the regulator of her position. Unfortunately, the application was closed after she submitted net pay maps, cross sections, seismic sections and pressure information into the public domain. And it was all for nothing.
Some applicants think that the more info they submit, the more the regulator will agree with them. This is not always the case. We find that you need to give just enough information to convince the regulator, no more and no less. Too little leaves them unconvinced. Too much information slows down the decision process while they critically review every piece. Our sister company, Proven Reserves, knows just how much information to submit.
Take a peek at his seismic. Help yourself to his application documents through our secure check out.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeEach AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.
Tags: AER application, Closure, Seismic, Tight
Granger Low 5 Jan 2016

AppIntel AI blog has delivered over 1 million pages views
Artificial Intelligence for the oil and gas industry

Getting flexibility in plant sulfur emissions
Sometimes it's all in the math

Haters know something you don't
Using the regulator to bully and save $3 million

Smartest hacks to make exploring much more rewarding
Exploration intelligence you can milk from industry submissions

Five impediments to adopting oil and gas artificial intelligence
How to keep up with innovation