Seismic in the public domain
Sometimes submitting less is more
This applicant even threw in her seismic to convince the regulator of her position. Unfortunately, the application was closed after she submitted net pay maps, cross sections, seismic sections and pressure information into the public domain. And it was all for nothing.
Some applicants think that the more info they submit, the more the regulator will agree with them. This is not always the case. We find that you need to give just enough information to convince the regulator, no more and no less. Too little leaves them unconvinced. Too much information slows down the decision process while they critically review every piece. Our sister company, Proven Reserves, knows just how much information to submit.
Take a peek at his seismic. Help yourself to his application documents through our secure check out.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeEach AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.
Tags: AER application, Closure, Seismic, Tight
Granger Low 5 Jan 2016

AI predicts the future for 2026
using leading indicators

Celebrating 2025, a year of innovation
Oil and gas paradigm shifts this year

RTF: Most refused submission type in November
Leading indicators from industry

Astrobleme impacts deep well disposal scheme
Learn from the experience of other operators

Non-meridian thermal wells
Still drilling horizontal wells N‑S? Why?




Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share