Life after polymer flood
This applicant is giving up on a polymer flood returning it to water injection. Although their pilot technically worked it didn't meet their corporate hurdles. Unfortunately, due to a technicality, the AER refused to terminate their scheme requiring them to continue injecting polyacrylamide polymer.
Applications are closed for two reasons: technical and technicality. When the AER says, "Sorry, we don't believe you should inject here," they're closing your application on technical grounds. If you notified the wrong parties or don't have a pool designation correct, that's technicality.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. You can get these applications in moments by clicking the button below.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Closure, Polymer
Granger Low 20 Oct 2015

Stay off the regulator’s enforcement ladder
Save millions in compliance costs

The hidden cost of not knowing
Steam hits the Clearwater

Experimental heavy oil recovery technology
AppIntel AI: More technology than technical papers. Much more.

Many start floods. Few can fix them.
Is this how you would treat your new prize asset?

How do you choose an AI?
AI selection criteria