Life after polymer flood

polyacrylamide structureThis applicant is giving up on a polymer flood returning it to water injection. Although their pilot technically worked it didn't meet their corporate hurdles. Unfortunately, due to a technicality, the AER refused to terminate their scheme requiring them to continue injecting polyacrylamide polymer.

Applications are closed for two reasons: technical and technicality. When the AER says, "Sorry, we don't believe you should inject here," they're closing your application on technical grounds. If you notified the wrong parties or don't have a pool designation correct, that's technicality.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. You can get these applications in moments by clicking the button below.

Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for free

Tags: Closure, Polymer

Granger Low  20 Oct 2015



Your AI search history is being sold to your competitors

Your use of AI is not free

Vetted oil and gas information

Using anything else is dangerous

Smarter acquisitions

Video demo on using the KiP box for acquisitions

AI alerts increase the speed of innovation

AI launches oil and gas operators from rival wins

Selfie-mail: emails to myself

I send more emails to myself than to any other person.

This page last updated 31 October 2025.
Copyright 2011-2025 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting answers from industry submissions adjudicated by the government. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share