Life after polymer flood

But refused on a technicality

This applicant is giving up on a polymer flood returning it to water injection. Although their pilot technically worked it didn't meet their corporate hurdles. Unfortunately, due to a technicality, the AER refused to terminate their scheme requiring them to continue injecting polyacrylamide polymer.

Applications are closed for two reasons: technical and technicality. When the AER says, "Sorry, we don't believe you should inject here," they're closing your application on technical grounds. If you notified the wrong parties or don't have a pool designation correct, that's technicality.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. You can get these applications in moments by clicking the button below.

Tags: Closure, Polymer

Granger Low  20 Oct 2015

Souring thermal schemes – the whole ball of string

AppIntel AI built to persuade. Loaded with evidence.

Flowback water has a second life

Frack water is too expensive to waste

9 potent ways to enhance steam injection: SAGD

Methane, propane, solvent or surfactant?

Let AppIntel AI watch this CO2 dispute for you

19 new developments today