Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Four ways your flood is crying for help
Can you hear it?
Great oil and gas operators don't just wing it — they focus
From uncertainty to control in One Day using AppIntel AI
Generative and agentic agents in oil and gas AI
Neural network used in seismic – why not in competitor surveillance?
AppIntel AI blog delivering over 50,000 pages views per month
Artificial Intelligence for the oil and gas industry
The making of an oil and gas AI.
Decoding the building blocks of Artificial Intelligence
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share