Mitigating flow to surface risk
Managing MOP by area
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Absent salt cavern education?
Things you didn't learn in school about salt caverns
There is nothing more painful than the price of trial and error
Complex, controversial, and costly water diversion plans
Very deliberate LPG – steam co-injection review
Find CSS solvent learnings before your competitors do
SAGD Solvent
The best additive in the SAG-Dverse
Seven habits for highly effective [tight] floods
Evolution or revolution?
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share