Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Selfie-mail: emails to myself
I send more emails to myself than to any other person.
Your next million barrels of heavy oil powered by AI
Quickly copy the successes of others
Shared: powerful side by side comparison of before and after polymer flood
Six fold oil production increase
Four ways your flood is crying for help
Can you hear it?
Great oil and gas operators don't just wing it — they focus
From uncertainty to control in One Day using AppIntel AI
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share