Mitigating flow to surface risk

pressure gaugeSoon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.

The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for free

Tags: Thermal, Compliance

Granger Low  20 Apr 2016



Haters know something you don't

Using the regulator to bully and save $3 million

Smartest hacks to make exploring much more rewarding

Exploration intelligence you can milk from industry submissions

Quickly copy industry successes

Add $20 million in extra NAV like this user

AdRegulatory application submission for only $3000

Limited time seat sale

Amid tariff uncertainty, Canadian well applications grow again

AppIntel AI leading indicators suggest operator optimism

AI helps Oil and Gas be wiser than Solomon

AI based in truth, not pop culture

AppIntel AI blog has delivered over 1 million pages views

Artificial Intelligence for the oil and gas industry

Getting flexibility in plant sulfur emissions

Sometimes it's all in the math

This page last updated 25 April 2025.
Copyright 2011-2025 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel AI is a website for getting answers from government oil and gas information sources. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share