Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these application docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
LLM more trendy than LNG?
Large Language Model for oil and gas
AppIntel: Work smarter, not harder
Those that can't see the value of a car should walk
Early solvent in heavy oil experiment
Partially upgrade bitumen in-situ
Rejected? You are not alone.
Facility amendments can be frustrating
Forgot to take care of that flood?
Schedule these 12 activities every year.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share