Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Too busy to use oil and gas AI?
Then you are too busy to add oil and gas production quickly
Energy industry badly needs AI for growth
But chatbots are giving AI a bad name
Pacify the picky regulator
They want all the details
The paradigm shift your competition hopes you ignore
How will you keep up with a once-in-a-generation investment opportunity?
LLM more trendy than LNG?
Large Language Model for oil and gas
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share