Mitigating flow to surface risk
Managing MOP by area
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
Industry environmental disputes come from new paradigms
How to resolve opposing agendas
AER's IAR was down
The Integrated Application Registry was down.
SAGD added CSS to make hybrid thermal scheme
Evolution or Revolution?
Six ways to unlock the secrets of high recovery polymer
Why it doesn’t always work and what to do about it
High VRR overrated?
Quotes five SPE papers
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share