Mitigating flow to surface risk

pressure gaugeSoon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.

The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for free

Tags: Thermal, Compliance

Granger Low  20 Apr 2016



Energy industry badly needs AI for growth

But chatbots are giving AI a bad name

Pacify the picky regulator

They want all the details

The paradigm shift your competition hopes you ignore

How will you keep up with a once-in-a-generation investment opportunity?

LLM more trendy than LNG?

Large Language Model for oil and gas

Experimental heavy oil recovery technology

AppIntel AI: More technology than technical papers. Much more.

Many start floods.  Few can fix them.

Is this how you would treat your new prize asset?

How do you choose an AI?

AI selection criteria

Don't handle pipeline noncompliance this way

Protect yourself - Read his application

Too busy to use oil and gas AI?

Then you are too busy to add oil and gas production quickly

This page last updated 25 July 2025.
Copyright 2011-2025 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting answers from industry submissions adjudicated by the government. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share