Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
The shortcut that could end your career and your company
Don’t start or optimize secondary recovery without expert help
Oil and gas will not tolerate AI hallucinations
AI for the industry must be trustworthy
Making more oil in a world where AI accelerates change like never before
Flooding the tight Montney
AI helps Oil and Gas be wiser than Solomon
AI based in truth, not pop culture
Mitigating Induced Seismicity – Calm on the surface
Not shaken. Not even stirred.
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share