Mitigating flow to surface risk
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
AppIntel AI blog has delivered over 1 million pages views
Artificial Intelligence for the oil and gas industry
Getting flexibility in plant sulfur emissions
Sometimes it's all in the math
Haters know something you don't
Using the regulator to bully and save $3 million
Smartest hacks to make exploring much more rewarding
Exploration intelligence you can milk from industry submissions
Five impediments to adopting oil and gas artificial intelligence
How to keep up with innovation
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share