Mitigating flow to surface risk
Managing MOP by area
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016
New flood to double reserves for heavy oil pool
The age of water floods is not over
Flood repatterning
Extended life support
Repairing microannulus in thermal wells
Check out the 4D seismic chamber thickness map
In-house AI attempts fail-80%
Spin off your in-house AI attempt
Facility fugitive emissions scrutiny
Keep your eye on the horizon of oil and gas change
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share