Flood refused by the regulator

Only one issue stood in the way of flood approval.

Simulation map This applicant did lots of technical work on his application including a black oil simulation model. We found this information using AppIntel.

But the applicant didn't consider this one issue that would stand in the way of flooding his pool. As a result, the AER refused his application.

Proven has submitted over a thousand applications. We know how to submit just enough information to get an approval and not so much information that causes regulator to study it hard. Can we help?

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=4d756y31393737373138375x57

Tags: Regulator, Closure, Flood

Granger Low  16 Jun 2015



Save the world: recycle floods

Injectant additives prolong reserve life

CHOPS not dead?

Controversial revival trial shows why recent AI info matters

Souring thermal schemes – the whole ball of string

AppIntel AI built to persuade. Loaded with evidence.

Flowback water has a second life

Frack water is too expensive to waste

There is nothing more painful than the price of trial and error

Complex, controversial, and costly water diversion plans

Very deliberate LPG – steam co-injection review

Find CSS solvent learnings before your competitors do

SAGD Solvent

The best additive in the SAG-Dverse

Seven habits for highly effective [tight] floods

Evolution or revolution?

This page last updated 21 August 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share