Seismic in the public domain

This applicant even threw in her seismic to convince the regulator of her position. Unfortunately, the application was closed after she submitted net pay maps, cross sections, seismic sections and pressure information into the public domain. And it was all for nothing.

Some applicants think that the more info they submit, the more the regulator will agree with them. This is not always the case. We find that you need to give just enough information to convince the regulator, no more and no less. Too little leaves them unconvinced. Too much information slows down the decision process while they critically review every piece. Our sister company, Proven Reserves, knows just how much information to submit.

Take a peek at his seismic. Help yourself to his application documents through our secure check out.

Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Tags: AER application, Closure, Seismic, Tight

Granger Low   5 Jan 2016

Case studies in AppIntel

Every blog post has one.

N/S E/W Does it matter which way you drill horizontal wells?

Is there science to drilling azimuth?

Tuning up your flood adds production

Cheapest reserves adds come from tune ups

Will AI take your job?

4 jobs that AI is poised to take