Mitigating flow to surface risk
Managing MOP by area
Soon after the AER's announcement of their study and decision about flow to surface, this operator decided to increase maximum operation pressure. He discusses differing pressures in several risk zones.
The AER agrees. Surface heaves in steam operations are a given -- the AER doesn't seem concerned with that phenomenon. The regulator is more concerned about basal water sand pressure, formation expansion index. Now you can read how they restricted pressures using these measures. We found this through AppIntel.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Get details of this cool tech Subscribers get them for freeTags: Thermal, Compliance
Granger Low 20 Apr 2016

Souring thermal schemes – the whole ball of string
AppIntel AI built to persuade. Loaded with evidence.

Flowback water has a second life
Frack water is too expensive to waste

9 potent ways to enhance steam injection: SAGD
Methane, propane, solvent or surfactant?

Let AppIntel AI watch this CO2 dispute for you
19 new developments today

Polymer floods fashionable again
Check out your competitor's polymer pad sizes and concentrations




Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Share