Flood refused by the regulator

Only one issue stood in the way of flood approval.

Simulation map This applicant did lots of technical work on his application including a black oil simulation model. We found this information using AppIntel.

But the applicant didn't consider this one issue that would stand in the way of flooding his pool. As a result, the AER refused his application.

Proven has submitted over a thousand applications. We know how to submit just enough information to get an approval and not so much information that causes regulator to study it hard. Can we help?

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=4d756y31393737373138375x57

Tags: Regulator, Closure, Flood

Granger Low  16 Jun 2015



NCGI hits mainstream

Methane injection in every pad

AER's IAR is down

The OneStop application query is down.

Trust is currency.  Ignore it and everything costs more.

AppIntel AI shows how to really prevent SAGD steam breakthrough

Bug floods are in fashion

Adjusting nutrients to grow microbes faster

Did caprock really fail?

Managing steaming risk in thermal schemes

10 ways to prevent steam flow to surface risk

And definitively prove it

Safely steaming

Assessing geological and wellbore risk

Newest CSS limestone paradigm

Oil and gas avoids jagged AI intelligence

This page last updated 13 November 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share