Life after ASP - Saving cost
Quietly this operator is removing the requirement to inject polymer from her flood. This ASP flood was approved six years ago. Now the operator will just inject water. Is this a cost saving initiative? Is it abandoning a failed flood? Did the operator get tired of the operational problems that go with an ASP flood? Reading applications can help you find out. We found this using AppIntel.
Since each application is ground-truthed to a UWI, you can look at this application and compare it with historical production. You can see what worked, and what didn't work at all. You can review the injection patterns established from an application. You can compare actual production to the plan proposed to the regulator.
Each AER application contains your neighbor's perspective on the exploitation of oil and gas formations. Applications contain more technical data even than SPE papers.
Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, multifractured wells, polymer schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help. Click the button below to get these application documents within moments.
Buy these submission docs now Subscribers get them for freeTags: Polymer, Flood, Cut costs
11 May 2016
Better views than from a drone
Watch and copy the successes of others
Six months of cash gone
Application denied
KiP - Search box on steroids
Finding free drilling locations
Desktop AI for quick copy of industry successes
Watch competitors -- Keep up with the Joneses