Regulator holds up CSS on max operation pressure concerns

Regulator wanted detail of MOP strategy and risk wells.

Stress as a function of depth chart The AER is holding up this CSS application because it wants more detail on maximum operating pressure strategy and because the applicant didn't address enough risk wells. The regulator is also seeking more detail on seismic interpretation of cap rock integrity.

Would you like to see what other operators in your areas are thinking about seismic, commercial schemes, experimental schemes and recovery? AppIntel can help.

Subscribers can view this application by pasting the following link into their browser after logging into AppIntel. http://app.appintel.info/AOW.php?pxnrg=7x616y313o3831383138343473

Tags: Thermal

Granger Low  25 May 2015



Save the world: recycle floods

Injectant additives prolong reserve life

CHOPS not dead?

Controversial revival trial shows why recent AI info matters

Souring thermal schemes – the whole ball of string

AppIntel AI built to persuade. Loaded with evidence.

Flowback water has a second life

Frack water is too expensive to waste

There is nothing more painful than the price of trial and error

Complex, controversial, and costly water diversion plans

Very deliberate LPG – steam co-injection review

Find CSS solvent learnings before your competitors do

SAGD Solvent

The best additive in the SAG-Dverse

Seven habits for highly effective [tight] floods

Evolution or revolution?

This page last updated 28 August 2026.
Copyright 2011-2026 by Regaware Systems Ltd.
  Calgary, Alberta, Canada
AppIntel is an AI service for getting intelligence from industry submissions vetted by government. Nothing on this page may be construed as engineering or geoscience advice. If you spot any errors on this site, please email our webmaster.
  Share